DoD Expands Restrictions on Supply Chain for Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten | Crowell & Moring LLP

Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.21.24

On May 30, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a final rule implementing Section 844 of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Section 854 of the FY 2024 NDAA by amending DFARS 225.7018-2 and accompanying DFARS clause 252.225-7052, which restrict DoD from acquiring certain metals and magnets from “covered countries” of Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China, to prohibit even earlier inputs in the supply chain from occurring in these countries. Despite comments discussing the infancy of the domestic market for many “covered materials”—defined as samarium-cobalt magnets, tantalum metals and alloys, tungsten metal powder, and tungsten heavy alloy or any finished or semi-finished component containing tungsten heavy alloy—the final rule expands the restrictions on sourcing covered materials from covered countries. Currently, the rule requires that covered materials not be melted or produced in covered countries but, effective January 1, 2027, the updated rule prohibits covered materials being mined, refined, separated, melted or produced in one of the covered countries. The expansion of the focus of the prohibition all the way back to where these materials were mined is consistent with the U.S. government’s effort to develop the domestic industrial base for and encourage on-shoring of critical minerals, magnets, and metals.

In addition, the final rule alters the applicability of the updated rule to commercially-available off-the-shelf (COTS) items, further limiting the COTS exception. COTS items are exempt from the current prohibition unless they are 50% or more tungsten by weight. Effective January 1, 2027, COTS items will be exempt from the updated prohibition unless they are 50% or more covered material (not just tungsten) by weight.

Now that the final rule has clarified requirements, companies should consider:

Stephanie L. Crawford

Counsel

c2NyYXdmb3JkQGNyb3dlbGwuY29t

Adelicia R. Cliffe

Partner

She/Her/Hers

YWNsaWZmZUBjcm93ZWxsLmNvbQ==

Alexandra Barbee-Garrett

Counsel

She/Her/Hers

YWJhcmJlZS1nYXJyZXR0QGNyb3dlbGwuY29t

Client Alert | 15 min read | 10.15.24

The European Commission’s Draft Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses: Towards Stricter Enforcement?

On August 1, 2024, the European Commission published its draft Guidelines on abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings. Their adoption would mark the first major update in over 15 years of the Commission’s guidance on the application of the prohibition of abuse of dominance laid down in Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Commission’s 2008 Guidance on enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, which received only a limited update in 2023, were once hailed as a welcome move away from a legalistic, form-based approach to an effects-based approached informed by economics. Is the pendulum now swinging back to a more formalistic approach based on presumptions, shifting the burden of proof onto dominant undertakings and heralding an era of stricter enforcement?...

Client Alert | 9 min read | 10.14.24

Cybersecurity Matured: DoD Finalizes Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program

Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.14.24

State AGs Challenge Nasdaq’s Diversity Disclosure Rule as Discriminatory

Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.11.24

Private Fund Adviser Fined for Insufficient MNPI Controls as SEC Continues to Scrutinize Ad Hoc Committee Participants

View All Insights